View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
geoffreylevens
Joined: 18 Nov 2009 Posts:
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:58 am Post subject: Osserman build |
|
|
So I have been captured by the photos/description of Stan Osserman's paipos. My just have to see what I can do though no telling when I will get it to the ocean, at the very least, a fun project.
Got a question though. I believe that the rider's body dimensions have much to do w/ performance (as in performance as in maneuvering not just speed lining) of given board, maybe even equal to rider's weight. Leverage on turns and all that. I am pretty short and experience tells me I need to shrink to fit. So the question is, does anyone (most likely Bob Green if anyone!) does anyone know how tall Stan is?
Rereading interview I think making a version of his wood bending "press" would be the easiest way to go, easier than attempting HD foam etc. Maybe even using thin sheets of evil Luan and build plywood in situ.
Ah, another question. Take a vote... Rough cut the outline first, of each layer, and then laminate in the press vs laminate will oversize and then cut to shape?
Muchos Gracias! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kage Dolphin Glider

Joined: 12 Jan 2004 Posts: 286 Location: Santa Cruz
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Geoff,
I admired Stans boards too and have been thinking about building a board by laminating thinner plies. I just made a long board skateboard with my son, we made our mold from gluing together 2" thick styrofoam and cutting in half to get the top and bottom molds. Sandwiched between 2x6's and clamped with pipe clamps it worked rather well. We could only use the mold a time or two again, but it was so quick to make, whatever. We used birch plies ( supposedly Baltic) a little thinner that luans. I have been thinking about using the same method for a paipo - to be able to get a better nose rocker without carving away at a block.
I also read a description of a skateboard builders mold made from 2 by whatever clamped sideways. Each 2 by representing a section of the board shape as if you sliced it into 2" sections, seemed like it might be applicable.
I'd like to hear about your build if you continue it. Not many answers here I guess, just more yap yap. I go for the short version too, I'd cut down the length on that board by 4" at least. _________________ No! it's not a f@cking boogie board. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geoffreylevens
Joined: 18 Nov 2009 Posts:
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was contemplating a blank about size of inflated Neumatic surf mat and sort of maximize the planning area sort of mini-Simmons template, maybe hippy in back like Stan's since it is a hard, prone board and not a stand-up and not a mat.
I like the idea of 3/4 inch ply reinforced w/ 2X4's and just cranking down on that. Very reproducible. Still figuring out how to get the tail edges to curve down to the "form". He did not have any bolt holes near edges, only to hold center flat and suck it down into the rocker (off block or wedge under nose). Maybe woodworking clamps, the kind that go on steel pipe and have screw/auger to tighten so plenty pressure available. Could take some time to get to but I will post some photos etc if/when I do.
Since smaller, I might reduce the concaves to 1/2 inch instead of 3/4 inch deep, depends on how much smaller I end up. His is pretty wide and I think I could handle/control a bit narrower better. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rodndtube Dolphin Glider

Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 690 Location: USA, MD, Baltimore
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My rule of thumb for foam/fiberglass boards is no longer than from the ground to the bottom of my sternum. That yields a good compromise between float and duck diving ability (not to be confused with ply or HPD neutral buoyancy).
The toe to base of sternum length enables paddling on the board without your knees catching the tail of the board. I have also ridden boards about 4 to 6 inches shorter. The foam/fiberglass boards are between 20 and 20.5 inches wide and 2.25 and 2.675 inches thick, at the thickest point. _________________ rodNDtube
"Prone to ride"
I love my papa li`ili`i |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
puurri
Joined: 26 Oct 2009 Posts: Location: sydney, OZ
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
^ You are on the money! I'm 190cm (6ft 3 inches) and my pintail twin device is 4ft 3 inches and is 1 inch short of your recommendation.
A further consideration is that overall control vs drag varies from a wave's height according to how much of your legs overhang on takeoff to provide sufficient propulsion and subsequent trim manoevures.
I'd suggest that Larry Goddard's recommendations mostly apply; esp nose parameters,early engagement of the longitudinal rail and esp the principle that width be increased and length shortened for mushy (low power) waves. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bgreen

Joined: 20 Feb 2004 Posts: Location: Qld. Oz
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Geoffrey,
I have no idea how tall Stan is but can ask. I'll ask about a board for someone with your height/weight as well.
I looked through some old e-mails from Larry. He recommends a board 75% of your height and "for 1-3 meter surf heights, then a width of around 30%" of a person's height. A bit narrower for 3-5 metre surf.
Bob |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geoffreylevens
Joined: 18 Nov 2009 Posts:
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
per Rod's measure that would be 44" long and by Larry'/Bob's 47"
30% my height would be 19" wide
All that fits right about in ball park of what I was thinking. Want to be able to easily have legs "dry" but also engage kicking for take-off etc.
This is though, for neutral buoyancy plywood board. 1-3 meter wave height sounds about right.
Both my surf mat (inflated) and my antique bodyboard are about 44X21 Of course those are floaty vs plywood so I would think that ply of around same size should be easier to crank over on a rail etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geoffreylevens
Joined: 18 Nov 2009 Posts:
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looking back at photos, looks like Larry puts his wide point towards center of board, more like surfboard and Stan puts his back near the tail (farther forward than but) similar to HPD. I guess if depends if you want to drive turns off your hip or your elbow? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bgreen

Joined: 20 Feb 2004 Posts: Location: Qld. Oz
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Geoffrey,
Doc mentioned to me that he thought Larry's boards were modelled on surfboard concepts. The other thing to consider is that Larry's boards were built as finned craft whereas Stans are finless.
Chris Garrett recently made me a board based on Larry's specifications.
Bob[/img] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geoffreylevens
Joined: 18 Nov 2009 Posts:
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bob, is that board you show finless? Maybe the "delta shape" on the HPD and Stans boards, that extra width in the rear can act more as a fin as you edge over... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bgreen

Joined: 20 Feb 2004 Posts: Location: Qld. Oz
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Geoffrey,
It was made with a 4-way fin system and has a pair of twin fins. I prefer it finless. If I was to get another - I'd go 1/4 - 1/2 " thinner. Rails were made a bit thinner for finless surfing and the rear rails are quite sharp.
I'll try to download the fins later.
Bob |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geoffreylevens
Joined: 18 Nov 2009 Posts:
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just came up w/ another practical consideration for dimensions. Checking around, most airlines seem to have some allowance for "boogie boards" etc. Quite a few allow carboard box or whatever as one of allowed checked bags, max dimensions L+W+D = 62 inches. So allowing room to fit board inside something that will fit those limitations might be smart for a travel board. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bgreen

Joined: 20 Feb 2004 Posts: Location: Qld. Oz
|
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bottom shot with fins installed:
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rodndtube Dolphin Glider

Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 690 Location: USA, MD, Baltimore
|
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
geoffreylevens wrote: | Just came up w/ another practical consideration for dimensions. Checking around, most airlines seem to have some allowance for "boogie boards" etc. Quite a few allow carboard box or whatever as one of allowed checked bags, max dimensions L+W+D = 62 inches. So allowing room to fit board inside something that will fit those limitations might be smart for a travel board. |
The 62 inches is the standard maximum length for checked bags, e.g., a suitcase or duffel bag. The same length is also commonly applied to numerous sporting goods that can be checked in lieu of a regular piece of luggage. A boogie board from several years ago roughly would fit that description: 40x20x2, but not when in a bag including flippers, wetsuit and clothing. Generally, my 50x20x2.5 inch paipo is checked as a "boogie" or "bodyboard" without charge and I keep an eye on the airlines that allow this. _________________ rodNDtube
"Prone to ride"
I love my papa li`ili`i |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bgreen

Joined: 20 Feb 2004 Posts: Location: Qld. Oz
|
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Geoffrey,
Stan is 5'-6" tall and 195#. His board is 48" long.
He added "For someone in the feather weight range I would recommend something about the size of the old Paipo Nui (based on the fact that I was about 125-140# when I rode them, and they seemed about right)".
For Paipo Nui lengths, see the Lindbergh or Growney interviews.
Bob |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|